<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brands Create Customers &#187; Definitions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenayagroup.com/blog/category/definitions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenayagroup.com/blog</link>
	<description>Brian Phipps on next-generation brands:</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:09:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The difference between a brand and a label</title>
		<link>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2010/06/29/the-difference-between-a-brand-and-a-label/</link>
		<comments>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2010/06/29/the-difference-between-a-brand-and-a-label/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Phipps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definitions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenayagroup.com/blog/?p=5931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In brands we make a very clear distinction between brands and labels. Here&#8217;s how I see it: The difference between a brand and a label is that a brand leads, while a label follows you around. That&#8217;s right: brands lead. Brands create opportunities for customers and lead them toward qualitatively better lives. Brands lead customers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-5933" title="label" src="http://tenayagroup.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/label.jpg" alt="label" width="433" height="244" /></p>
<p>In brands we make a very clear distinction between brands and labels. Here&#8217;s how I see it:</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #003366;"><strong>The difference between a brand and a label is that a brand leads, while a label follows you around.</strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">That&#8217;s right: brands lead. Brands create opportunities for customers and lead them toward qualitatively better lives. Brands lead customers toward new shapes of self, and toward new forms of being and doing. And yes, brands lead by example.</p>
<h3 style="text-align: left;">Take the T-shirt test</h3>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000000;"><em>Quick test:</em><strong> </strong>check that T-shirt you&#8217;re wearing. Is it taking you somewhere you&#8217;d never reach without it? Or is it just following you around? If it&#8217;s leading you somewhere special, and your feet just skim the ground, you&#8217;re wearing a brand. Otherwise, you&#8217;re stitched to a label.<strong><br />
</strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000000;">And here&#8217;s a corollary:</span></p>
<h3 style="text-align: left;">Brands make things happen. Labels tag along.</h3>
<p style="text-align: left;">Brands open doors&#8212;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Flammarion.jpg">big ones</a>. They help us interoperate with the universe. Labels help you sort things in a drawer.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Let&#8217;s unpack this distinction a bit.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<h3><span style="color: #003366;"><span style="color: #000000;">Brands lead us on a unique journey</span><strong><br />
</strong></span></h3>
<p>A brand, when properly developed, <a href="http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2008/05/30/visualizing-the-brand-journey/">leads us on a unique journey</a>, from high adventure to inner peace, and to a thousand points between. The brand embarks on a venture beyond the status quo. It&#8217;s going somewhere interesting, and it asks us to join the crew.</p>
<h3>Labels bring up the rear</h3>
<p>In contrast, labels bring up the rear. They don&#8217;t invent, innovate, incite or inspire. They&#8217;re inventory. They have their place (on a shelf), but it&#8217;s the brand that connects with customers and flies out the door.</p>
<p>Frankly, labels are stuck: on a garment, on a bottle or on a package. Buy the label and you&#8217;re stuck, too.</p>
<h3>From label to brand package</h3>
<p>Brands elevate the label to the brand package. The brand package wraps the customer, the company and the product in the brand journey. Soaring above and beyond the product, it&#8217;s the <a href="http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2007/02/18/how-brands-create-customers-part-1/">ticket to ride</a>.</p>
<h5>Photo credit: <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cryptic_clothing_label.jpg">Wikimedia Commons</a></h5>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Ftenayagroup.com%2Fblog%2F2010%2F06%2F29%2Fthe-difference-between-a-brand-and-a-label%2F&amp;title=The%20difference%20between%20a%20brand%20and%20a%20label" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://tenayagroup.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2010/06/29/the-difference-between-a-brand-and-a-label/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brands and commodities: two rules</title>
		<link>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/08/04/brands-and-commodities-two-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/08/04/brands-and-commodities-two-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 00:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Phipps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Definitions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/08/04/brands-and-commodities-two-rules/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just thought I&#8217;d break this out from a longer post on brands and commodities. It should be airtight, but I sense leaks. As always, comments appreciated. Brands and commodities: two rules Brand: The shortest distance between customer and company. Commodity: The shortest distance between customer and price. Rules: When the brand is strong, customer and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img align="middle" style="padding: 0px 0px 10px" src="http://www.tenayagroup.com/blog/wp-admin/images/pricephoto.jpg" /></p>
<p>Just thought I&#8217;d break this out from a longer post on brands and commodities. It should be airtight, but I sense leaks. As always, comments appreciated.</p>
<h3>Brands and commodities: two rules</h3>
<ol>
<li><strong>Brand</strong>: The shortest distance between customer and company.</li>
<li><strong>Commodity</strong>: The shortest distance between customer and price.</li>
</ol>
<h4>Rules:</h4>
<ol>
<li>When the brand is strong, customer and company are one</li>
<li>When commodity is strong, company and customer are done.</li>
</ol>
<h4>Coda:</h4>
<p>If you&#8217;re in it for the money, your customers will be in it for the price.</p>
<p><em>Update:</em> Changed &#8220;Moral&#8221; to &#8220;Coda&#8221;</p>
<h5>(And yes, deepest apologies to <a href="http://www.cs.rice.edu/~ssiyer/minstrels/poems/368.html">Wm.Blake</a>, RIP.)</h5>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Ftenayagroup.com%2Fblog%2F2006%2F08%2F04%2Fbrands-and-commodities-two-rules%2F&amp;title=Brands%20and%20commodities%3A%20two%20rules" id="wpa2a_4"><img src="http://tenayagroup.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/08/04/brands-and-commodities-two-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Brand space&#8221; and the creation of new markets</title>
		<link>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/08/03/brand-space-and-the-creation-of-new-markets/</link>
		<comments>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/08/03/brand-space-and-the-creation-of-new-markets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 03:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Phipps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definitions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/08/03/brand-space-and-the-creation-of-new-markets/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part of the fun in building brands is that while one half of your mind plumbs the nuanced depths of brand context, the other half peers three years out to leverage that context into new business opportunities. Welcome to &#8220;brand space,&#8221; where it&#8217;s microscope to one eye, telescope to the other. Brand space is the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><img align="top" style="padding: 5px 0px 20px" src="http://www.tenayagroup.com/blog/wp-admin/images/telescopeSF1.jpg" /><br />
</strong>Part of the fun in building brands is that while one half of your mind plumbs the nuanced depths of brand context, the other half peers three years out to leverage that context into new business opportunities. Welcome to &#8220;brand space,&#8221; where it&#8217;s microscope to one eye, telescope to the other.</p>
<h3>Brand space is the realm of new business</h3>
<p>As a brand builder, &#8220;brand space&#8221; is one of your most useful concepts. It encompasses all the territories where your brand intends a presence. Consider it your brand turf. Much of your brand space is forward focused. It contains the brand elements that will rise to the surface and nurture your business when your company launches new products and services. In fact, you will always be priming some part of your brand space for emerging markets.</p>
<p>There is a cardinal rule of brand space: use it, or lose it.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s look more closely at brand space, and then examine an example of brand space that&#8217;s unfolding in real time.</p>
<h3>Brand space defined</h3>
<p>I define brand space as &#8220;an emergent customer context in which the brand takes a leadership role.&#8221; Your brand space is the potential value domain of your brand: where your brand plans to go. It&#8217;s your brand&#8217;s extended realm, or some aspect of its &#8220;manifest destiny.&#8221; Your brand space is typically far larger than the served space of your current, &#8220;operational&#8221; brand. It projects the customer and the brand forward, toward the next (higher) brand platform that&#8217;s on your brand roadmap. (And you do have one of these, right?)</p>
<p>A brand that&#8217;s well crafted will command a set of strategically related brand spaces that foreshadow where the customer is headed. Ideally, the brand moves the customer forward into those brand spaces essential for customer growth, and for the growth of the business. This is one reason why brand teams are also product development teams. Brand spaces assume a strong product/brand integration.<br />
<img align="middle" style="padding: 10px 10px 20px" src="http://www.tenayagroup.com/blog/wp-admin/images/brandspace.jpg" /><br />
It&#8217;s important that the brand space is a &#8220;value context.&#8221; By that I mean it intends to deliver a new form of brand value for the customers to be created. Areas where you deploy brand spaces may have no current customers (virgin markets) or may have existing customers served by ho-hum brands. Your brand space needs to offer a new protocol of pleasure, protocol of performance, or protocol of whatever that will redefine customers out of the bog-like context that&#8217;s currently holding them back.</p>
<p>And, as shown above, the ascendant architecture of your brand platforms will dictate where your brand spaces will become fertile fields. Brand spaces are the bow waves of brand platforms.</p>
<h3>Brand space and competitive advantage</h3>
<p>If you want to beat competitors to the punch, it pays to use your brand space to enter nascent markets at the earliest opportunity. While your competitors are building out their feature lists, you can be delivering the pre-product experiences that align customers to your brand months before actual product introduction. This is not about hype or &#8220;making promises.&#8221; It&#8217;s about knowing what freedoms your customers crave, what freedoms your offerings will deliver, and giving customers a measured taste up front.</p>
<h3>Brand space example: WiFi-enabled handsets</h3>
<p>Tom Evslin has a <a href="http://blog.tomevslin.com/2006/07/voip_over_wifi_.html">fascinating post</a> on dramatic changes coming to the mobile phone market. In a few years mobile phones will be WiFi enabled, meaning they can connect to the Internet  wherever there&#8217;s a WiFi signal. That means, of course, that those WiFi phone calls will then be VoIP, and possibly, or probably, <em>free</em>. As you can imagine, and as Tom details, this threatens a major disruption of the telco carriers who now control things via their cell networks. One of the ripple effects is our brand space example. To quote Tom:</p>
<blockquote><p>WiFi support in mobile phones <em>will shift the balance of power from the big wireless operators to the cellphone hardware and software makers</em>. Phones will be purchased independently of calling plans just as computers are purchased independent of Internet connectivity arrangements. Coupons for access may be included with phones instead of phones being included with calling plans. Why? Because voice calling will be too cheap to meter and hardware will still cost something. [my emphasis]</p></blockquote>
<p>This amounts to a HUGE market shift. If you&#8217;re a maker of electronic devices and software whose products have personal communication potential, this change signals the potential opening of lucrative markets previously held captive by the major carriers. Perhaps there&#8217;s a future for you in the handset business, if you can leverage existing brand strengths in portable electronic devices, WiFi, design, and computer/Internet interoperability. If you&#8217;ve been on your toes, your brand space beneath this potential market will be jumping. It will already include a rich mobile communication context that can fit hand-in-glove with a WiFi-enabled handset. Your brand space is your running start, a latent brand context ready to be activated. If/when you launch that phone, customers will be standing by. The new market will appear to be naturally yours from the get-go.</p>
<p>I, of course, am no one to foment <a href="http://www.mobilemag.com/content/100/340/C8902/">rumors</a>.</p>
<h5>Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/wurzle/1607663/">laughlin</a>, Flickr</h5>
<p style="margin-left: 40px">
<p style="margin-left: 40px">
<p style="margin-left: 40px">
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Ftenayagroup.com%2Fblog%2F2006%2F08%2F03%2Fbrand-space-and-the-creation-of-new-markets%2F&amp;title=%26%238220%3BBrand%20space%26%238221%3B%20and%20the%20creation%20of%20new%20markets" id="wpa2a_6"><img src="http://tenayagroup.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/08/03/brand-space-and-the-creation-of-new-markets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How legacy brands can create a brand vacuum</title>
		<link>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/07/25/how-legacy-brands-can-create-a-brand-vacuum/</link>
		<comments>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/07/25/how-legacy-brands-can-create-a-brand-vacuum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Phipps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definitions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/07/25/how-legacy-brands-can-create-a-brand-vacuum/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It pays to keep an eye on legacy brands, because they can create the kind of brand vacuum that spells market opportunity for disruptor brands. Simply put, legacy brands stand tall on feet of clay. They&#8217;re fragile because they don&#8217;t cultivate the resilient customer connections that make for enduring brand strength. They may have a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img align="top" style="padding: 5px 0px 20px" src="http://www.tenayagroup.com/blog/wp-admin/images/pipe%20salsaboy1.jpg" /><br />
It pays to keep an eye on legacy brands, because they can create the kind of brand vacuum that spells market opportunity for  disruptor brands. Simply put, legacy brands stand tall on feet of clay. They&#8217;re fragile because they don&#8217;t cultivate the resilient customer connections that make for enduring brand strength. They may have a boat-load of high-drama symbols and a spiffy showcase sheen, but on the real terrain where customers run they don&#8217;t get much traction&#8212;and a brand vacuum is born.</p>
<h3>Legacy brands defined</h3>
<p>Here&#8217;s how we define legacy brands in our <a href="http://tenayagroup.com/blog/the-new-brand-glossary/">New Brand Glossary</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Legacy Brands </strong><br />
Backward-facing brands that can suck the future from a company. Legacy brands are predicated on top-down, command and control models which position the customer as a passive commodity, purely to be sold to. Legacy brands are vulnerable to competitors who create active partnerships with customers to innovate on brand, elevating customers from “commodities” to value co-creators.</p></blockquote>
<h3>Lack of brand value creates the brand vacuum</h3>
<p>Because legacy brands focus primarily on themselves, and because they speak down to customers, they find it increasingly difficult to create new brand value. The more exuberant and ethereal their self-styled spectacle, the more they create a brand vacuum that others are sure to fill. The vacuum is a brand value void.</p>
<h3>Icon brands take note</h3>
<p>Companies with legacy brands are vulnerable in their markets, and on the M&#038;A front. If your task is to husband a brand that rarely listens to customers because &#8220;icons don&#8217;t need ears,&#8221; be forewarned.</p>
<h6>Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/salsaboy/">salsaboy</a>, flickr</h6>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Ftenayagroup.com%2Fblog%2F2006%2F07%2F25%2Fhow-legacy-brands-can-create-a-brand-vacuum%2F&amp;title=How%20legacy%20brands%20can%20create%20a%20brand%20vacuum" id="wpa2a_8"><img src="http://tenayagroup.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/07/25/how-legacy-brands-can-create-a-brand-vacuum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Caveat emptor: every company&#8217;s default brand</title>
		<link>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/04/17/caveat-emptor-everyones-default-brand/</link>
		<comments>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/04/17/caveat-emptor-everyones-default-brand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Phipps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Concepts and Methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand Trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caveat Emptor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/04/17/caveat-emptor-everyones-default-brand/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It usually happens like this: whenever we&#8217;re discussing the new elements of brand strategy someone in the room will say: &#8220;That sounds great, but my company really doesn&#8217;t need a brand. We&#8217;re not in retail. We&#8217;re not a consumer goods company. We don&#8217;t worry about packaging and shelf space and stuff like that.&#8221; A default [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It usually happens like this: whenever we&#8217;re discussing the new elements of brand strategy someone in the room will say: &#8220;That sounds great, but my company really doesn&#8217;t need a brand. We&#8217;re not in retail. We&#8217;re not a consumer goods company. We don&#8217;t worry about packaging and shelf space and stuff like that.&#8221;</p>
<h3>A default brand your market assigns to you</h3>
<p>There are several ways to address the &#8220;brands don&#8217;t apply to us&#8221; issue. I like to start with the universal form of brand that runs like a dial-tone through all markets, affecting all companies.</p>
<p>&#8220;What about your default brand?&#8221;  I ask. &#8220;That&#8217;s the brand your market assigns to you. Every company has a default brand, whether they realize it or not. It competes with the real you from day one.&#8221;</p>
<h3>A company&#8217;s default brand is <em>&#8220;caveat emptor&#8221;</em></h3>
<p>I explain that a company&#8217;s default brand is called <em>caveat emptor</em>. This brand premise is embedded in potential customers. It&#8217;s been driven deep into their minds by society, the markets, and by their own experience. It tells them that until they know otherwise, their behavior toward you should be &#8220;buyer beware.&#8221;</p>
<h3><em>Caveat emptor</em> is your brand until you demonstrate otherwise</h3>
<p><em>Caveat emptor</em> is the first hurdle you cross as you build your active brand to create customers.</p>
<p>And yes, it is <em>your </em>brand, until you demonstrate otherwise.</p>
<p>.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Ftenayagroup.com%2Fblog%2F2006%2F04%2F17%2Fcaveat-emptor-everyones-default-brand%2F&amp;title=Caveat%20emptor%3A%20every%20company%26%238217%3Bs%20default%20brand" id="wpa2a_10"><img src="http://tenayagroup.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/04/17/caveat-emptor-everyones-default-brand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brands are code</title>
		<link>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/03/24/brands-are-code/</link>
		<comments>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/03/24/brands-are-code/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 19:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Phipps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand Interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand Platforms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fundamentals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/03/24/brands-are-code/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most people don&#8217;t realize it, but brands are code. At their core level, brands have much more in common with software development than they do with logos and product identities. Think of brands as a form of software. In fact, brands should be viewed as an extension of the product development process itself, rather than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2028" title="code" src="http://tenayagroup.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2006/03/code.jpg" alt="code" width="433" height="202" /></p>
<p>Most people don&#8217;t realize it, but <strong>brands are code</strong>. At their core level, brands have much more in common with software development than they do with logos and product identities. Think of brands as a form of software. In fact, brands should be viewed as an extension of the product development process itself, rather than as a separate, multi-media &#8220;add-on&#8221; just before product launch.</p>
<p>This is because brands are much more than symbols, slogans and promises. Brands are programs <a href="http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2007/02/18/how-brands-create-customers-part-1/">to create customers</a>. And as programs, they&#8217;re built of  . . .   <em>code</em>.</p>
<p>In this snapshot, let&#8217;s take a look at some of the reasons why brands are code, beginning at the outside and working in.</p>
<h3>Unlocking brand code</h3>
<p>First, some interesting similarities between brands and software:</p>
<ul>
<li>Both have <em>architectures</em>.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>They have <em>roadmaps</em>.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>They have <em>platforms</em></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>They have <em>programs</em>.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>They have <em>interfaces</em>.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Brands and software are both <em>executables</em>.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>They have <em>developers</em>, and <em>end-users</em>.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>And most importantly, they have <a href="http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/02/09/brand-apis-are-where-the-action-is/">innovation rich API’s</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p>Brands have a language, too. In fact, they are written in only one language. It is called CUSTOMER. It is a language that is  infinitely interoperable.</p>
<h3>What brand builders code</h3>
<p>At a basic level, brand builders code customer solutions into the product. In this interactive process, they also code the whole customer back into the company. This enables customer DNA to flow through a company, through its employees, operations and innovations. At a more advanced level, brand builders code new freedoms into the customer through the brand, enabling customers to rise above commodities and other brands. In effect, they create a branded customer platform that advances the customer beyond what products alone can provide.</p>
<h3>Brands as executables</h3>
<p>Of course, brands are not static images or frozen icons. Brands are action-oriented. They work for customers, and they get things done. In other words, <em>brands are executables. </em>Every brand is a &#8220;.exe.&#8221; When you execute on brand, you deliver value that customers can use. Strategically, your brand should be advancing customers beyond the reach of competitors.</p>
<h3>How brand code works</h3>
<p>Simply stated, brands are code for creating value. Their architectures, platforms, programs and interfaces transform latent product value into value realized by the customer. (This is no easy task.) At their best, brands do this in such satisfyingly brilliant ways that the customer leaves his or her old customer shell behind, and embraces the new brand going forward. When a great brand connects, there&#8217;s no turning back.</p>
<p>How exactly does a brand do this? First, <a href="http://www.tenayagroup.com/BrandCore.htm">brand building begins at the core of a company</a>. Brands are not <a href="http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/02/27/why-brands-are-not-add-ons/">add-ons after the fact</a>. Brands are a process of architecting customer progress into the product roadmap. Yep, the operative word is &#8220;progress.&#8221; The goal of a brand is to advance customers to progressively proactive levels, so in future months and years they will be demanding all those cool innovations you have up your sleeve. Thus, your brand strategy is part and parcel of your <a href="http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/12/13/value-based-brands-part-ii-brand-innovation/">innovation strategy</a>.</p>
<h3>Cultivate brand hacks</h3>
<p>Agile brands, like agile code, call for <a href="http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2007/03/21/multi-threaded-brands-and-why-you-need-them/">iterative development</a>. This is one reason why your brand should <a href="http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/12/06/cultivate-brand-hacks/">cultivate brand hacks</a> as part of its deployment strategy.</p>
<h5>Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/amymichon/2948499105/sizes/o/">amysphere</a> &#8212; Flickr</h5>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Ftenayagroup.com%2Fblog%2F2006%2F03%2F24%2Fbrands-are-code%2F&amp;title=Brands%20are%20code" id="wpa2a_12"><img src="http://tenayagroup.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/03/24/brands-are-code/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Geoffrey Moore on &#8220;innovation myths&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/02/16/geoffrey-moore-on-innovation-myths/</link>
		<comments>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/02/16/geoffrey-moore-on-innovation-myths/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Phipps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definitions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/02/16/geoffrey-moore-on-innovation-myths/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over at Sandhill.com Geoffrey Moore dissects ten &#8220;innovation myths,&#8221; and then makes solid business sense of what remains on the bone. Read his essay if you&#8217;re in brands. Innovation is what you do.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over at <a href="http://www.sandhill.com/opinion/editorial.php?id=66">Sandhill.com</a> Geoffrey Moore dissects ten &#8220;innovation myths,&#8221; and then makes solid business sense of what remains on the bone.</p>
<p>Read his essay if you&#8217;re in brands. Innovation is what you do.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Ftenayagroup.com%2Fblog%2F2006%2F02%2F16%2Fgeoffrey-moore-on-innovation-myths%2F&amp;title=Geoffrey%20Moore%20on%20%26%238220%3Binnovation%20myths%26%238221%3B" id="wpa2a_14"><img src="http://tenayagroup.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/02/16/geoffrey-moore-on-innovation-myths/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It’s time to re-think “brand essence”</title>
		<link>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/02/03/it%e2%80%99s-time-to-re-think-%e2%80%9cbrand-essence%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/02/03/it%e2%80%99s-time-to-re-think-%e2%80%9cbrand-essence%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 20:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Phipps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creating Customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definitions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenayagroup.com/blog/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the traditional tasks of brand practice is to spend time, energy and money to divine “brand essence.” This is the quest to distill the “soul of the brand,” that irreducible quality that will distinguish and infuse brand programs going forward. Meetings are held. Surveys conducted. Minds probed. Navels gazed. The mission statement is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">One of the traditional tasks of brand practice is to spend time, energy and money to divine “brand essence.” This is the quest to distill the “soul of the brand,” that irreducible quality that will distinguish and infuse brand programs going forward. Meetings are held. Surveys conducted. Minds probed. Navels gazed. The mission statement is dusted off and re-read, often with perplexed faces. After all this, the usual result is essence by committee, one that’s “different enough” from competitors, but still more-or-less the same so it won’t disturb anyone’s routine.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">It’s thus no surprise that a few years down the road, this compromise essence wanes. Sales slip. Markets are lost. The brand must be “refreshed,” and the “essence cycle” is repeated.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">What a waste! There has to be a better way.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I’d like to propose a different approach to brand essence. In the true spirit of navel gazing, it’s a shift in focus: from an “inny” to an “outie.” In other words, don’t look inside for your essence. (Trust me, there’s only lint.) Find your brand essence in what you do for customers. (That’s the “outie.”)  <em>The bottom line is that your customers will define your brand essence, not you.</em></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">And I propose making brand essence action-based, rather than an inert asset. It’s much more dynamic than some sacred fluid locked in the company vault.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>So here’s how I see it:</strong> The essence of brand is collaboration. Brands are collaborations in context between a company, its customers and the product. (Yes, products themselves play a role.) To change your essence, do something different with customers. If you want a better essence, create better customers.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: Verdana">Your essence is in their hands.</span></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Ftenayagroup.com%2Fblog%2F2006%2F02%2F03%2Fit%25e2%2580%2599s-time-to-re-think-%25e2%2580%259cbrand-essence%25e2%2580%259d%2F&amp;title=It%E2%80%99s%20time%20to%20re-think%20%E2%80%9Cbrand%20essence%E2%80%9D" id="wpa2a_16"><img src="http://tenayagroup.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/02/03/it%e2%80%99s-time-to-re-think-%e2%80%9cbrand-essence%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What brands do</title>
		<link>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/02/02/what-brands-do/</link>
		<comments>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/02/02/what-brands-do/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 16:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Phipps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definitions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenayagroup.com/blog/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In our Pages section (sidebar top) I&#8217;ve added a concise definition of what brands do. It is an anthem of sorts for a new perspective on brands, one predicated on value and innovation. This new perspective has several things going for it: It disrupts the comfy, lazy world of mainstream brands. It will flush out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In our Pages section (sidebar top) I&#8217;ve added a concise definition of what brands do. It is an anthem of sorts for a new perspective on brands, one predicated on value and innovation.</p>
<p>This new perspective has several things going for it:</p>
<ol>
<li>It disrupts the comfy, lazy world of mainstream brands. It will flush out the slugs.</li>
<li>It puts brands on a new playing field.</li>
<li>It identifies new opportunities for creative companies, and for creative individuals in those companies.</li>
<li>It does the same for customers.</li>
<li>It opens up new avenues of value between companies and customers. What now seem like dull or &#8220;mature&#8221; markets may harbor significant growth potential.</li>
<li>It explains the title of this blog.</li>
</ol>
<p>This same material is included on our site, but I&#8217;ve added it here because it underlies 99% of my posts.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Ftenayagroup.com%2Fblog%2F2006%2F02%2F02%2Fwhat-brands-do%2F&amp;title=What%20brands%20do" id="wpa2a_18"><img src="http://tenayagroup.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/02/02/what-brands-do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

