
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The brand is in the details</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2009/08/14/the-brand-is-in-the-details/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2009/08/14/the-brand-is-in-the-details/</link>
	<description>Brian Phipps on next-generation brands:</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 15:28:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Phipps</title>
		<link>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2009/08/14/the-brand-is-in-the-details/comment-page-1/#comment-106446</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Phipps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 03:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenayagroup.com/blog/?p=2650#comment-106446</guid>
		<description>John,

I think you&#039;re completely correct about the changing nature of &quot;details&quot; in brands, especially as companies move toward co-creating brands with customers. In our digital era, the most critical brand &quot;detail&quot; seems to be how the brand integrates the customer into a wider and more fulfilling world. This is the brand as customer enabler, delivering real value customers can use, rather than some emotional fizz. As such, brand &quot;details&quot; have moved off the product and into the customer proper. As you suggest, great brands will be great listeners.

In my view the company/customer brand relationship is at heart a collaborative brand journey, as I&#039;ve described here:  http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2008/05/30/visualizing-the-brand-journey/.  The brand model is one of shared iterations, rather than some brand masterpiece delivered from on high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re completely correct about the changing nature of &#8220;details&#8221; in brands, especially as companies move toward co-creating brands with customers. In our digital era, the most critical brand &#8220;detail&#8221; seems to be how the brand integrates the customer into a wider and more fulfilling world. This is the brand as customer enabler, delivering real value customers can use, rather than some emotional fizz. As such, brand &#8220;details&#8221; have moved off the product and into the customer proper. As you suggest, great brands will be great listeners.</p>
<p>In my view the company/customer brand relationship is at heart a collaborative brand journey, as I&#8217;ve described here:  <a href="http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2008/05/30/visualizing-the-brand-journey/" rel="nofollow">http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2008/05/30/visualizing-the-brand-journey/</a>.  The brand model is one of shared iterations, rather than some brand masterpiece delivered from on high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Blossom</title>
		<link>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2009/08/14/the-brand-is-in-the-details/comment-page-1/#comment-106445</link>
		<dc:creator>John Blossom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenayagroup.com/blog/?p=2650#comment-106445</guid>
		<description>Good piece, you bring up key points. I wonder, though, about the power of a brand such as Google which has been built largely on quite imperfect products. It&#039;s perpetual &quot;beta&quot; approach is now being curbed somewhat as they focus more on fewer, more finished items, but in general they make it a point to get people hands-on in the product development process at its early stages. In this way, there is a dedicated community of people who get invested in the brand through Google&#039;s incorporation of feedback from these enthusiasts. Not every product or company can afford to take this approach, but I do think that the traditional brand development process is being challenged on many fronts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good piece, you bring up key points. I wonder, though, about the power of a brand such as Google which has been built largely on quite imperfect products. It&#8217;s perpetual &#8220;beta&#8221; approach is now being curbed somewhat as they focus more on fewer, more finished items, but in general they make it a point to get people hands-on in the product development process at its early stages. In this way, there is a dedicated community of people who get invested in the brand through Google&#8217;s incorporation of feedback from these enthusiasts. Not every product or company can afford to take this approach, but I do think that the traditional brand development process is being challenged on many fronts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Phipps</title>
		<link>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2009/08/14/the-brand-is-in-the-details/comment-page-1/#comment-106436</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Phipps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenayagroup.com/blog/?p=2650#comment-106436</guid>
		<description>And brands that respect their customers always seem to take care of the details that count.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And brands that respect their customers always seem to take care of the details that count.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Brody</title>
		<link>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2009/08/14/the-brand-is-in-the-details/comment-page-1/#comment-106431</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Brody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenayagroup.com/blog/?p=2650#comment-106431</guid>
		<description>Good post Brian. 

And I think you raise an extremely important, though sometimes overlooked point. All great brands are supported/bolstered by brilliant execution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post Brian. </p>
<p>And I think you raise an extremely important, though sometimes overlooked point. All great brands are supported/bolstered by brilliant execution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

