
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monopolies make bad brands</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2008/01/17/monopolies-make-bad-brands/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2008/01/17/monopolies-make-bad-brands/</link>
	<description>Brian Phipps on next-generation brands:</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 15:28:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Phipps</title>
		<link>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2008/01/17/monopolies-make-bad-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-54311</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Phipps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2008/01/17/monopolies-make-bad-brands/#comment-54311</guid>
		<description>Perhaps a new regime in Washington can prod the FCC into mandating more openness in broadcasting, so digital providers can compete with incumbents on a level playing field. Once an open digital broadcast technology is feasible, maybe even via WiMax, why would anyone want to stay under the thumb of old cable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps a new regime in Washington can prod the FCC into mandating more openness in broadcasting, so digital providers can compete with incumbents on a level playing field. Once an open digital broadcast technology is feasible, maybe even via WiMax, why would anyone want to stay under the thumb of old cable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob La Gesse</title>
		<link>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2008/01/17/monopolies-make-bad-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-54230</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob La Gesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 04:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2008/01/17/monopolies-make-bad-brands/#comment-54230</guid>
		<description>Most cable company employees get their service free, or deeply subsidized.  They don&#039;t feel our pain.  

I&#039;ve often hated on my cable company (just search my blog for Time Warner and you will see).

Someone has to be able to do better.  And it won&#039;t be the phone company (been there done that).

Wouldn&#039;t it be great to have a real Internet company supplying your Internet?

Maybe Google, or someone...

Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most cable company employees get their service free, or deeply subsidized.  They don&#8217;t feel our pain.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve often hated on my cable company (just search my blog for Time Warner and you will see).</p>
<p>Someone has to be able to do better.  And it won&#8217;t be the phone company (been there done that).</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it be great to have a real Internet company supplying your Internet?</p>
<p>Maybe Google, or someone&#8230;</p>
<p>Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

