How legacy brands can create a brand vacuum


It pays to keep an eye on legacy brands, because they can create the kind of brand vacuum that spells market opportunity for disruptor brands. Simply put, legacy brands stand tall on feet of clay. They’re fragile because they don’t cultivate the resilient customer connections that make for enduring brand strength. They may have a boat-load of high-drama symbols and a spiffy showcase sheen, but on the real terrain where customers run they don’t get much traction—and a brand vacuum is born.

Legacy brands defined

Here’s how we define legacy brands in our New Brand Glossary:

Legacy Brands
Backward-facing brands that can suck the future from a company. Legacy brands are predicated on top-down, command and control models which position the customer as a passive commodity, purely to be sold to. Legacy brands are vulnerable to competitors who create active partnerships with customers to innovate on brand, elevating customers from “commodities” to value co-creators.

Lack of brand value creates the brand vacuum

Because legacy brands focus primarily on themselves, and because they speak down to customers, they find it increasingly difficult to create new brand value. The more exuberant and ethereal their self-styled spectacle, the more they create a brand vacuum that others are sure to fill. The vacuum is a brand value void.

Icon brands take note

Companies with legacy brands are vulnerable in their markets, and on the M&A front. If your task is to husband a brand that rarely listens to customers because “icons don’t need ears,” be forewarned.

Photo: salsaboy, flickr

4 Responses to “How legacy brands can create a brand vacuum”

  1. James Thomson Says:

    in any sector legacy brands will remain particulary backward looking when their competitors share their traditions of complacency. I see this within the Scotch Whisky sector - rather than take the risk to re-invent, re-invigourate the brand or become more forward looking, the marketing and mainboard guys play safe and consolidate so that they improve (1) their physical distribution channels and (2) their brand budget. Johnnie Walker and Chivas Regal are good examples.

  2. Brian Phipps Says:

    Good comment. I hadn’t thought of it before, but I guess there are probably “brand clusters” of legacy brands where an industry conveniently thinks as one and only differentiates individual brands via advertising, or market mechanics. These clusters would be ripe for disruption. If one could identify such a cluster, one could probably figure out an asymmetric brand move that might capture customers within a new sphere of brand imagination. Any industry that resembles musk oxen circled against wolves would be a candidate.

  3. James Thomson Says:

    Brian you’ve got it immediately in one - I found both your replies (here and in your subsequent reply to my comment to your post “Beyond the brand icon model”) instantly insightful and (luckily) I think we, as a whisky brand, are moving in the quite dramatic (for our industry anyway) way you outline so well in “Beyond the brand icon model”. I’ll continue under that post…

  4. Brands Create Customers » Blog Archive » How the iPod redefines newspaper brands Says:

    […] It’s a case of what can happen to legacy brands when what they deliver is now done (better) by someone else. […]

Leave a Reply