<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft’s Brand Opportunity</title>
	<link>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/02/03/microsoft%e2%80%99s-brand-opportunity/</link>
	<description>Brian Phipps on next-generation brands:</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Brands Create Customers &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsofties want better brands</title>
		<link>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/02/03/microsoft%e2%80%99s-brand-opportunity/#comment-36</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 03:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tenayagroup.com/blog/2006/02/03/microsoft%e2%80%99s-brand-opportunity/#comment-36</guid>
					<description>[...] Dare and Scoble make some good points. I&amp;#8217;ve touched on Microsoft&amp;#8217;s brand quandaries here, here, and here, and obliquely in my post Brands are code. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Dare and Scoble make some good points. I&#8217;ve touched on Microsoft&#8217;s brand quandaries here, here, and here, and obliquely in my post Brands are code. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
